What Emotions do Pre-university Students Feel when Engaged in Computational Thinking Activities?
Keywords:Computational Thinking, Emotions, Primary Education, Secondary Education
Emotions affect how we acquire knowledge, being one of the causes of the demotivation generated at the time of studying a new field. Computer Science does not always pique the interest of young people, so we carry out an analysis of emotions that are present in primary and secondary school students, around 8-9 years old and 12-13 years old, who engage in Computational Thinking activities, considering the educational level, gender, and type of intervention, to understand why this lack of interest. The sessions were based on 1 hour of face-to-face class in which activities related to Computational Thinking were carried out. The instrument used to measure emotions was the Developmental Channels Questionnaire which includes 13 different emotions that students must answer using the Likert scale from 0 to 10. The emotions felt have been mostly positive and ambiguous, while negative emotions have a low intensity, particularly in primary education. Regarding the educational level, there are differences between girls and boys only in the secondary education, while in the primary they are no significant. Also, girls show an evolution when carrying out this type of activity, while boys do not change.
Achim, N., & Kassim, A. A. (2015). Computer usage: The impact of computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 701-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.422
Bisquerra Alzina, R. (2003). Educación emocional y competencias básicas para la vida. Revista De Investigación Educativa, 21(1), 7-43.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Paper presented at the Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting,
Dávila-Acedo, M. A., Airado-Rodríguez, D., Cañada-Cañada, F., & Sánchez-Martín, J. (2021). Detailed emotional profile of secondary education students toward learning physics and chemistry. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 659009. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659009
Dou, R., Bhutta, K., Ross, M., Kramer, L., & Thamotharan, V. (2020). The effects of computer science stereotypes and interest on middle school boys' career intentions. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 20(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394964
Force, C. T. (2020). Computing curricula 2020: Paradigms for global computing education (CC2020) (2020 December 31 ed.). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3456302
Fowler, R. R., & Su, M. P. (2018). Gendered risks of team-based learning: A model of inequitable task allocation in project-based learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(4), 312-318. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2018.2816010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2018.2816010
Funke, A., Berges, M., & Hubwieser, P. (2016). Different perceptions of computer science. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.1
Giannakos, M. N., Jaccheri, L., & Leftheriotis, I. (2014). Happy girls engaging with technology: Assessing emotions and engagement related to programming activities. (pp. 398-409). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_38
Giannakos, M. N., Jaccheri, L., & Proto, R. (2013). Teaching computer science to young children through creativity: Lessons learned from the case of norway. Paper presented at the Computer Science Education Research Conference, 103-111.
Goldberger, M., Ashworth, S., & Byra, M. (2012). Spectrum of teaching styles retrospective 2012. Quest (National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education), 64(4), 268-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2012.706883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2012.706883
Goo, J. J., Park, K. S., Lee, M., Park, J., Hahn, M., Ahn, H., & Picard, R. W. (2006). Effects of guided and unguided style learning on user attention in a virtual environment. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 1208-1222). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11736639_151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11736639_151
Henry, J., & Dumas, B. (2018). Perceptions of computer science among children after a hands-on activity: A pilot study. Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1811-1817. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363454
Honomichl, R. D., & Chen, Z. (2012). The role of guidance in children's discovery learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 3(6), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1199
Hubwieser, P., Armoni, M., Brinda, T., Dagiene, V., Diethelm, I., Giannakos, M., Knobelsdorf, M., Magenheim, J., Mittermeir, R., & Schubert, S. (2011). Computer science/informatics in secondary education. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education - Working Group Reports, , 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/2078856.2078859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2078856.2078859
Impagliazzo, J., & Pears, A. N. (2018). The CC2020 project—computing curricula guidelines for the 2020s. Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2021-2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363484
Kass, G. V. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Series C (Applied Statistics), 29(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2986296
Kay, R. H. (2008). Exploring the relationship between emotions and the acquisition of computer knowledge. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1269-1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.002
Kim, H. S., Kim, S., & Lee, W. J. (2021). Extending computational thinking into information and communication technology literacy measurement. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 21(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427596
Kurtz-Costes, B., Copping, K. E., Rowley, S. J., & Kinlaw, C. R. (2014). Gender and age differences in awareness and endorsement of gender stereotypes about academic abilities. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(4), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0216-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0216-7
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls' interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424-437. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
Medeiros, R. P., Ramalho, G. L., & Falcao, T. P. (2019). A systematic literature review on teaching and learning introductory programming in higher education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(2), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2018.2864133
Mellado Jiménez, V., Borrachero, A. B., Brígido, M., Melo, L. V., Dávila, M. A., Cañada, F., & ., E. a. (2014). Emotions in science teaching. Enseñanza De Las Ciencias, 32(3), 11-36. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1478
Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2002). Teaching physical education (Fifth ed.). Benjamin Cummings.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology, 41(4), 359-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1992.tb00712.x
Plante, I., Théorêt, M., & Favreau, O. E. (2009). Student gender stereotypes: Contrasting the perceived maleness and femaleness of mathematics and language. Educational Psychology (Dorchester-on-Thames), 29(4), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410902971500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410902971500
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Commun.ACM, 52(11), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
Riesco, M., Fondón, M., Gutiérrez, D. Á, Lopez, B., Cernuda, A., & Juan, A. (2014). La informática como materia fundamental en un sistema educativo del siglo XXI. Paper presented at the Xx Jenui, 27-32.
Seneviratne, O. (2017). Making computer science attractive to high school girls with computational thinking approaches: A case study. Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking (pp. 21-32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_2
Shim, J., Kwon, D., & Lee, W. (2017). The effects of a robot game environment on computer programming education for elementary school students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(2), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2016.2622227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2016.2622227
Strachan, R., Peixoto, A., Emembolu, I., & Restivo, M. T. (2018). Women in engineering: Addressing the gender gap, exploring trust and our unconscious bias. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), , 2088-2093. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363497
Tsolakidis, S., & Anagnostou, G. (2011). The impact of physical education teaching styles on the construction of pupils’ literate subjectivities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics of the Faculty of Philosophy, 145-154.
Webb, M., Davis, N., Bell, T., Katz, Y., Reynolds, N., Chambers, D., & Sysło, M. (2017). Computer science in K-12 school curricula of the 2lst century: Why, what and when? Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 445-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9493-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9493-x
Wong, B. (2016). 'I'm good, but not that good': Digitally-skilled young people's identity in computing. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1292604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1292604
Zatarain Cabada, R., María Lucía Barrón Estrada, José Mario Ríos Félix, & Giner Alor Hernández. (2018). A virtual environment for learning computer coding using gamification and emotion recognition. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1048-1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1558256
Zendler, A., Spannagel, C., & Klaudt, D. (2011). Marrying content and process in computer science education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(3), 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2010.2062184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2010.2062184
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Rafael Herrero-Álvarez, Coromoto León, Gara Miranda, Eduardo Segredo, Óscar Socas, María Cuellar-Moreno, Daniel Caballero-Juliá
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).